domingo, julho 30, 2006

Uma mentira repetida muitas vezes.

"Daniel Oliveira, num artigo do Expresso em que critica a reescrita da história, vem dizer que o Hezbollah só lançou misseis sobre Israel após de Israel ter bombardeado as infra-estruturas libanesas. Ora, a BBC descreve assim o primeiro acto desta guerra:

Hezbollah fighters based in southern Lebanon launch Katyusha rockets across the border with Israel, targeting the town of Shlomi and outposts in the Shebaa Farms area
."

Blasfémias

Depois da tentativa de negação do arrastão de Carcavelos já nada surpreende na prosa dos Bloquistas. Nem mesmo as propostas económicas sugeridas por Louça.

"Infelizmente, esta esquerda órfã de referências resolveu adoptar a defesa do terrorismo travestida de apego pela paz ou pela liberdade. Não há admiração. Afinal, eles são os mesmos que nunca criticaram a ETA, que sempre gostaram das FPs e do camarada Otelo, que nunca conseguiram esconder simpatias ocultas por todos os grupelhos terroristas que actuaram em nome de velhos ideias ditos de esquerda. Todos os dias há atentados terroristas no Iraque, mas eles só vão às manifestações contra a América. Eles desfilam em defesa de terroristas galegos mas não alinham com o Basta Ya. Eles perdem-se de amores por todos os que criticam a América, o capitalismo e Israel, as anti-causas que lhes restam de muitos anos de pensamentos inconsequentes derrotados pela história, incapazes que foram de arquivar as t-shirts de Che."

12 Comments:

Anonymous Anónimo said...

Não só repetem as mentiras mil vêzes como também escondem informação.

No mundo árabe, a CS controlada pelos governos não faz criticas ao Hezbollah nem refere que este se mistura com as populações civis, antes pelo contrário. Desta maneira, mostrando a desgraça das mortes civis, perpetuam o ódio a Israel.

Será isto revelado e comentado pela nossa CS? Será que não sabem?

domingo, julho 30, 2006  
Anonymous Anónimo said...

Critérios jornalisticos

/O melhor da cobertura do conflito no Médio Oriente feita pela RTP são as reportagens de José Rodrigues dos Santos no Líbano. Rodrigues dos Santos mostra, obviamente, tudo aquilo que acompanha inevitavelmente uma guerra. A violência, a destruição, o medo. Mas mostra também o que se passa nos locais atingidos por Israel. Mostra como são controlados pelo Hezbollah, como o Hezbollah tudo domina, e em todos manda. Pena que, mal acabem as reportagens de Rodrigues dos Santos, a RTP regresse à ladaínha dos "alvos exclusivamente civis", desmentida nas reportagens que ela própria emite, e que ela própria ignora./

Extraido do blog O Insurgente

domingo, julho 30, 2006  
Anonymous Anónimo said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/28/world/middleeast/28arabs.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

Palavras para quê ?

domingo, julho 30, 2006  
Blogger PA said...

Nota Editorial:
Este comentário não é da minha autoria, mas dá que pensar ...

"Porque carga de água, sempre que se verifica o bombardeamento de qualquer cidade ou lugar do Líbano há senhores jornalistas que
referem/afirmam/explicam/justificam/desculpabilizam dizendo que se tratou de um ataque a um bastião do Hezbollah.

Veja-se no dicionário:

bastião
do Fr. bastion
s. m.,

trincheira;
muro que serve de anteparo ao ângulo saliente de uma fortaleza;
baluarte;
sentido figurado reduto; sustentáculo.

Fico impressionado com sabedoria que exalam.. Como é que eles lograram saber/divisar/descobrir/investigar/adivinhar que aquelas cidades ou lugares são:
um muro do Hezbollah;
uma trincheira do Hezbollah;
uma fortaleza do Hezbollah;
um baluarte do Hezbollah;
um reduto do Hezbollah;
um sustentáculo do Hezbollah;

Deixo aqui algumas hipóteses explicativas para tanta sapiência. Escolha aquela que lhe parecer a melhor (ou a menos má...!!!):
* porque são bem informados
* porque foi a informação que colheram no local
* porque são os dados de que dispõem
* porque consultaram o CIA Fact Book
* porque perguntaram ao Mossad
* porque se não fosse assim... Israel não atacava
* porque pesquisaram na net
* porque toda a gente diz isso
* porque tinham de dizer qualquer coisa
* porque estão a gozar connosco
* porque nos estão a chamar parolos
* porque...

Mãezinha...!!!"

domingo, julho 30, 2006  
Anonymous Anónimo said...

Words take on new meanings as Israel struggles to survive.



A “ceasefire” would occur should Hezbollah give back kidnapped Israelis and stop launching missiles; it would never follow a unilateral cessation of Israeli bombing. In fact, we will hear international calls for one only when Hezbollah’s rockets are about exhausted.

“Civilians” in Lebanon have munitions in their basements and deliberately wish to draw fire; in Israel they are in bunkers to avoid it. Israel uses precision weapons to avoid hitting them; Hezbollah sends random missiles into Israel to ensure they are struck.

“Collateral damage” refers mostly to casualties among Hezbollah’s human shields; it can never be used to describe civilian deaths inside Israel, because everything there is by intent a target.

“Cycle of Violence” is used to denigrate those who are attacked, but are not supposed to win.

“Deliberate” reflects the accuracy of Israeli bombs hitting their targets; it never refers to Hezbollah rockets that are meant to destroy anything they can.

“Deplore” is usually evoked against Israel by those who themselves have slaughtered noncombatants or allowed them to perish — such as the Russians in Grozny, the Syrians in Hama, or the U.N. in Rwanda and Dafur.

“Disproportionate” means that the Hezbollah aggressors whose primitive rockets can’t kill very many Israeli civilians are losing, while the Israelis’ sophisticated response is deadly against the combatants themselves. See “excessive.”

Anytime you hear the adjective “excessive,” Hezbollah is losing. Anytime you don’t, it isn’t.

“Eyewitnesses” usually aren’t, and their testimony is cited only against Israel.

“Grave concern” is used by Europeans and Arabs who privately concede there is no future for Lebanon unless Hezbollah is destroyed — and it should preferably be done by the “Zionists” who can then be easily blamed for doing it.

“Innocent” often refers to Lebanese who aid the stockpiling of rockets or live next to those who do. It rarely refers to Israelis under attack.

The “militants” of Hezbollah don’t wear uniforms, and their prime targets are not those Israelis who do.

“Multinational,” as in “multinational force,” usually means “third-world mercenaries who sympathize with Hezbollah.” See “peacekeepers.”

“Peacekeepers” keep no peace, but always side with the less Western of the belligerents.

“Quarter-ton” is used to describe what in other, non-Israeli militaries are known as “500-pound” bombs.

“Shocked” is used, first, by diplomats who really are not; and, second, only evoked against the response of Israel, never the attack of Hezbollah.

“United Nations Action” refers to an action that Russia or China would not veto. The organization’s operatives usually watch terrorists arm before their eyes. They are almost always guilty of what they accuse others of.


What explains this distortion of language? A lot.

First there is the need for Middle Eastern oil. Take that away, and the war would receive the same scant attention as bloodletting in central Africa.

Then there is the fear of Islamic terrorism. If the Middle East were Buddhist, the world would care about Lebanon as little as it does about occupied Tibet.

And don’t forget the old anti-Semitism. If Russia or France were shelled by neighbors, Putin and Chirac would be threatening nuclear retaliation.

Israel is the symbol of the hated West. Were it a client of China, no one would dare say a word.

Population and size count for a lot: When India threatened Pakistan with nukes for its support of terrorism a few years ago, no one uttered any serious rebuke.

Finally, there is the worry that Israel might upset things in Iraq. If we were not in Afghanistan and Iraq trying to win hearts and minds, we wouldn’t be pressuring Israel behind the scenes.

But most of all, the world deplores the Jewish state because it is strong, and can strike back rather than suffer. In fact, global onlookers would prefer either one of two scenarios for the long-suffering Jews to learn their lesson. The first is absolute symmetry and moral equivalence: when Israel is attacked, it kills only as many as it loses. For each rocket that lands, it drops only one bomb in retaliation — as if any aggressor in the history of warfare has ever ceased its attacks on such insane logic.

The other desideratum is the destruction of Israel itself. Iran promised to wipe Israel off the map, and then gave Hezbollah thousands of missiles to fulfill that pledge. In response, the world snored. If tomorrow more powerful rockets hit Tel Aviv armed with Syrian chemicals or biological agents, or Iranian nukes, the “international” community would urge “restraint” — and keep urging it until Israel disappeared altogether. And the day after its disappearance, the Europeans and Arabs would sigh relief, mumble a few pieties, and then smile, “Life goes on.”

And for them, it would very well.

domingo, julho 30, 2006  
Anonymous Anónimo said...

Também não estou a ver os árabes defender Israel pelo que é natural as manifestações a favor dos irmãos do Hezbollah.

domingo, julho 30, 2006  
Anonymous Anónimo said...

SE os arabes (muculmanos) baixassem as armas: nao havia mais violencia.

Se os israelitas baixassem as armas: nao havia mais Israel.



Agora vejam este mapa:

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4170/870/1600/Israel.gif

domingo, julho 30, 2006  
Anonymous Anónimo said...

Estas situações devem ser analizadas com a frieza que a distância aconselha. Daí se poderem fazêr algumas perguntas.

Qual o "porquê" disto tudo?

A quem "convém mais" a morte de civis? Note-se a repetição contínua das imagens de TV.

Porque será que o governo libanês não evacua todos os civis do sul do país?

Como foi possível o Hezbollah manter uma milicia e prepará-la para a guerra durante 6 anos, nas barbas da UNIFIL?


Se os comentadores puserem a emoção de lado e se libertarem de ideologias, encontrarão respostas mais equilibradas.

domingo, julho 30, 2006  
Anonymous Anónimo said...

A verdade é que o Libano está prisioneiro do Hezbollah que está melhor equipado que o exército legal.

domingo, julho 30, 2006  
Anonymous Anónimo said...

ETA asesina

terça-feira, agosto 01, 2006  
Anonymous Anónimo said...

That's a great story. Waiting for more. 03 camry air filter wrench Non evasive liposuction Fisting and huge toys list of famous baseball players English dubbed adult cartoons on dvd thong ass mature gallery literotica Appliances stoughton massachusetts Tvs peps Locate military cash advance information asian anal lottery result

quarta-feira, abril 25, 2007  
Anonymous Anónimo said...

Hello,

When ever I surf on web I never forget to visit this website[url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/lose-10-pounds-in-2-weeks-quick-weight-loss-tips].[/url]Lots of good information here carvalhadas-on-line.blogspot.com. I am sure due to busy scedules we really do not get time to care about our health. In plain english I must warn you that, you are not serious about your health. Research displays that closely 70% of all USA adults are either obese or overweight[url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/lose-10-pounds-in-2-weeks-quick-weight-loss-tips].[/url] Therefore if you're one of these citizens, you're not alone. Infact many among us need to lose 10 to 20 lbs once in a while to get sexy and perfect six pack abs. Now next question is how you can achive quick weight loss? Quick weight loss can be achived with little effort. Some improvement in of daily activity can help us in losing weight quickly.

About me: I am author of [url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/lose-10-pounds-in-2-weeks-quick-weight-loss-tips]Quick weight loss tips[/url]. I am also mentor who can help you lose weight quickly. If you do not want to go under difficult training program than you may also try [url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/acai-berry-for-quick-weight-loss]Acai Berry[/url] or [url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/colon-cleanse-for-weight-loss]Colon Cleansing[/url] for effective weight loss.

domingo, março 21, 2010  

Enviar um comentário

<< Home

Divulgue o seu blog!